#1 vs *[BRC]* (2-0) by Vanquish 05.05.2015 01:53


.rC|: Xemi, Vanquish
*[BRC]*: abyss/RafaeL, FuRy

We picked d3. went ok, can't really remember how the flag was lost, meh. we played well nevertheless (imo)

They picked urban. We had a pretty bad start, they forced a flagbattle early on which they ended up winning, but we managed to pull the momentum back gradually from there, especially as our (my) aim warmed up. reason for us having a bad start? I blame too much dirtybomb (we so gud at it tho)

yeah anyway ggssssssssssssssssss (+ Karrigan #1 IGL in csgo fuckyeah)

#2 RE: vs *[BRC]* (2-0) by LeaN 05.05.2015 02:36


that fps gg

can i play in your pc? lel

#3 RE: vs *[BRC]* (2-0) by Vanquish 05.05.2015 02:52


if you're ever in england, sure

#4 RE: vs *[BRC]* (2-0) by Marti 05.05.2015 10:29


Unstable fps!!!! :o

#5 RE: vs *[BRC]* (2-0) by Vanquish 05.05.2015 11:02


well I'm playing on ultra + full HD resolution which probably explains it. on low settings my fps doesn't budge, but I think people make way too much of a big deal out of getting a high framerate anyway. I can't tell the difference between 500 and 1000 and I think 200 is enough to play "competitively". Even 125 is playable, it only really becomes a problem when you go below that (for me i'd need at least 150 though because i've got 144hz).

#6 RE: vs *[BRC]* (2-0) by LeaN 09.05.2015 04:01


IN AC. 250 fps is almost the same than 1000 fps. im using /maxfps 125 atm. cuz unhits + lag... it makes my gameplay a bit more stable.. but 200 - 250 its perfect.

Xobor Create your own Forum with Xobor